From: Chris
Date: 04 Apr 2000
Time: 18:58:49
Remote Name: ip183.little-rock10.ar.pub-ip.psi.net
Dear Jasper,
I hope you read my reply to Kari. I intend no insult to you. Only observation and deduction of a currently ongoing(redundant) discussion, not a 6+ yr old highly contreversial trial with limited information. I am stating, given that criteria, I have seen no PROOF(ofwhichyouclaimtohave)from you or anyone else to the contrary. O.J. was aquitted, not guilty what is the difference despite anyones opinion? Kari states his(O.J.'s innocence(typo), he already has that status by LAW. I am of the OPINION, none of this speculation will make any difference only contreversy.(possibly to your advantage)