Home | Contents | Search Iago Conspirators Timeline Junot
From: Jasper
Date: 4/6/02
Time: 3:59:36 AM
Thank you Kari,
This is what I was about to reply to Rovaan before your post popped up...
Rovaan,
I don't know how you did it, but you missed the point.
The point is, it was physically impossible for O.J. to have been there in the first place. You can't come from someplace you haven't been. O.J. couldn't have been south of his park bench much less behind the garage or behind the Bentley or a big tree. Kato would have had to look right at him without seeing him or run right through him without seeing or touching him. That simply cannot happen in the real world.
Neither interpretation of Marcia's story or anything in between match the photos, the physical evidence, the testimony or the laws of physics. And there is nothing that you or I can add to them to make them reasonable. As soon as we do, it is no longer a version of Marcia's story it's a version of yours or mine.
The only model that works with the testimony, the phone records the physical evidence, the photos and the laws of physics is Kato's Walk.
All of the Rockingham animations follow the transcripts or, in Fuhrman's case, what he writes in Murder in Brentwood. It's not me who has O.J. behind the bungalow doing nothing for all that time; it's Marcia Clark. Fuhrman's Story plugs that absurd hole in Marcia's Story but it has it's own fatal flaw. John Junot said it all in a Smoking Gun post entitled "Why Fuhrman's Theory is so Dumb." I thought it was obvious. --Jasper