Investigators in the June 12,1994 Double Homicide at 875 South Bundy Drive

 

West L.A. Homicide

Lt. Frank Spangler, West L.A. Supervisor of Detectives.  Spangler testified in the O.J. criminal trial, "I have something like 38 detectives in my entire division." He could not give a fixed number because of a West L.A. program created to allow officers without homicide experience in any LAPD division to be attached to the West L.A. Homicide unit on a single case. The West L.A. Homicide unit consisted of three permanently assigned men, Ron Phillips, Mark Fuhrman and Brad Roberts, with an open slot for an unspecified detective. Ron Phillips testified that he filled that slot on June 13, 1994 with a trainee detective called Tom Nolan. No evidence is available to us at this time to prove that this detective ever existed. Spangler would have necessarily known who he was if he did exist or had reason to question who Phillips said he was until Fuhrman claimed in a February 19, 1997 TV interview with Geraldo Rivera that Nolan witnessed a fingerprint in blood on Nicole's back gate. 

Like all LAPD detectives, West L.A. detectives were ranked I (the lowest) to III (the highest). Detective III was equivalent in pay grade to sergeant. Notwithstanding his title, Phillips did not functioned as investigators. He was the first highest ranking detective on the Bundy murder scene, but as an administrator, his job was to select the active investigators, to give them specific assignments and to facilitate their work. He gave the orders and was responsible for monitoring where they went and what they did to carry them out. How he could do this with Fuhrman and his partner at different addresses without the cell phone that he said he gave to Officer Riske when he left for Rockingham with Fuhrman, Vannatter and Lange at 5:00 a.m. on the 13th has not been explained

Det. III Ron Phillips, West L.A. Homicide Coordinator  Although Phillips was on Marcia Clark's witness list in the O.J. preliminary hearing she did not call him to testify. In the O.J. criminal trial Phillips testified falsely under direct examination by Marcia Clark that he was Mark Fuhrman's partner on June 13, 1994 just as Fuhrman did in the preliminary hearing. Under cross-examination by O.J.'s attorney Johnnie Cochran, Phillips admitted that he was not Fuhrman's partner that morning.

Phillips was Fuhrman's senior partner in the West L.A. Homicide unit from 1991 to July, 1993 when Phillips took the newly created administrative position of West L.A. Homicide Coordinator. Phillips thus became Fuhrman's supervisor as well as the supervisor of Fuhrman's new partner Brad Roberts.

Phillips also testified falsely that he sent Detective Nolan to the West L.A. police station from Bundy along with Roberts to question one witness. The only known witnesses at the time were the man and his wife who were led to the bodies on Bundy by Nicole's dog. Steven Schwab, the single witness who found the dog was at home in bed on Montana Street a long block north of the Bundy murder scene. The West L.A. Police Station was approximately three miles southeast of the murder scene. The combined testimony of the officers on Bundy (other than Phillips, Fuhrman and Roberts) and the three witnesses involved with Nicole's dog on the night of the murders indicates that another man was with Roberts but he did not come from Bundy and he did not have to be a detective. 

Det. II Mark Fuhrman, first lead investigator in the Bundy murders. He was the only person in the case who matches up physically, psychologically and historically with all the evidence used against O.J. in his criminal trial. If O.J. didn't do it, whoever did had to have the personal contacts, professional know-how and self-made opportunities that Fuhrman had to commit the murders and point the finger of blame at O.J. The killer had to understand the system from the inside. He had to know what homicide detectives, medical examiners and prosecutors look for crimes of passion and how they process that information when they see it. He had to be able to create convincing illusions to make impossible actions attributed to O.J. seem dead certain that O.J. performed them and things the killer could do easily seem implausible, impractical or impossible. To perform these feats of "magic" he needed to know everything that Mark Fuhrman knew, all the people that Fuhrman knew and be able to put himself everywhere Mark Fuhrman put himself as the first lead detective on the case.

Det. I Brad Roberts, Mark Fuhrman's partner in the Bundy murder investigation.   

Det. Trainee Tom Nolan

 

LAPD Robbery/Homicide Division (RHD)

Partners -- Det. III Phil Vannatter and  Det. III Tom Lange

Partners -- Det. Burt Luper and Det. Cliff LeFall

Partners -- Det. Richard Haro and Det. James Harper

Partners -- Det. Tippin and Det. Carr

 

District Attorney's Office

Stephen Oppler

David Thomson

Michael Stevens

 

Defense Team's Private Investigators

John McNally

Pat McKenna

William Pavelic

 

Independent Investigators

Ian Bowater: Private Investigator for Donald Freed. Gathered information used in the preparation of Freed's book Killing Time.

 

From Phillips' February 16, 1995 testimony in the O.J. criminal case:

Q: BY MR. COCHRAN: AND, DETECTIVE, SO THAT WE'RE CLEAR ABOUT THIS, THIS IS A RECORD OF YOUR CELLULAR CALLS MADE. LET'S TALK ABOUT JUNE 12TH AND ON JUNE 13TH. IS THAT CORRECT?

A: YES, SIR.

Q: AND YOU GOT THIS CALL SHORTLY AFTER 1:00 O'CLOCK IN THE MORNING; IS THAT CORRECT?

A: YES, SIR.

Q: AND SO THAT WOULD BE 6-13 AFTER 1:00 O'CLOCK IN THE MORNING?

A: YES, SIR.

Q: YOU THEN MADE A NUMBER OF CALLS -- LET'S SEE -- ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE CALLS WITHIN ABOUT 12 MINUTES; IS THAT CORRECT?

A: YES, SIR.

Q: AFTER YOU GOT THE PHONE? WHERE WERE THOSE CALLS MADE TO?

A: THOSE WERE ALL CALLS MADE TO LOS ANGELES POLICE DETECTIVES' RESIDENCES.

Q: ALL RIGHT. AND THOSE WERE FIVE CALLS MADE ALMOST IMMEDIATELY AFTER YOU GOT THE CALL TO COME TO THE LOCATION?

A: YES. AS I HAD PREVIOUSLY STATED, THREE OF THOSE CALLS, THE DETECTIVES WERE UNABLE TO RESPOND FOR VARIOUS REASONS AND TWO OF THE CALLS WERE PEOPLE THAT DID RESPOND.

Q: ALL RIGHT. NOW, WELL YOU WERE AT HOME AT THIS POINT, RIGHT?

A: NO. I WAS IN MY CAR.

Q: SO YOU -- LET'S SEE. YOU GOT THE CALL AT 1:00 O'CLOCK OR 1:05?

A: YES.

Q: AND YOU WERE IN YOUR CAR BY 1:18?

A: YES, SIR.

Q: YOU'RE A FAST DRESSER, AREN'T YOU?

A: I HAVE IT ALL LAID OUT FOR ME THE NIGHT BEFORE.

Q: I SEE. SO IN OTHER WORDS, YOU GET A CALL AT 1:00 O'CLOCK AND BY 1:18, YOU'RE DRIVING IN YOUR CAR?

A: YES, SIR.

Q: IN 18 MINUTES. ALL RIGHT.

A: I'VE GOTTEN IT DOWN TO A SCIENCE WITH --

Q: I SEE. YOU COULD HAVE CALLED THESE PEOPLE FROM YOUR HOME, IS THAT CORRECT, BUT YOU CALLED FROM YOUR CAR?

A: I MADE TWO PHONE CALLS FROM MY HOME TO OFFICER FUHRMAN OR DETECTIVE FUHRMAN AND DETECTIVE ROBERTS TO INITIALLY GET THEM RESPONDING.

Q: THAT WAS RIGHT AT -- THAT WAS BETWEEN WHAT TIME AND WHAT TIME?

A: RIGHT AFTER I RECEIVED THE CALL.

Q: THAT WAS 1:00 O'CLOCK.

A: I MADE THE FIRST CALL TO MARK FUHRMAN I BELIEVE AT 1:05.

Q: ALL RIGHT. AND THEN WHAT TIME DID YOU CALL ROBERTS?

A: WITHIN A COUPLE OF MINUTES AFTER THAT.

Q: SO BETWEEN 1:05 AND 1:08?

A: AS LONG AS IT TOOK ME TO LOOK UP HIS PHONE NUMBER AND DIAL THE PHONE.

Q: ALL RIGHT. AND IT'S YOUR TESTIMONY THAT THE OTHER FIVE CALLS BEGINNING AT 1:18, BETWEEN 1:18 AND 1:30 WERE TO WHOM?

A: OTHER LOS ANGELES POLICE DETECTIVES WHO WORKED OUT OF WEST LOS ANGELES THAT WERE ASSIGNED TO MY TABLE. AS I'VE TOLD YOU, I HAD THE MAC UNIT, THE HOMICIDE UNIT AND ANOTHER UNIT. SO I WAS GOING TO HAVE ADDITIONAL UNITS RESPOND TO ASSIST. THREE OF THOSE DETECTIVES WERE UNABLE TO RESPOND FOR PERSONAL REASONS.

Q: ALL RIGHT. LET'S TAKE -- YOU RECALL FIVE OF THEM ALTOGETHER?

A: ONE OF THOSE PHONE CALLS I BELIEVE IS A MISS -- I DIALED THE NUMBER WRONG. AND SO I HAD TO REDIAL IT AGAIN. I THINK THERE WAS ONLY FOUR CALLS MADE, BUT THERE'S FIVE INSTANCES HERE, BUT ONE OF THEM WAS A MISTAKE. WHEN I WAS DRIVING THE CAR, I MADE A PHONE CALL, I PUNCHED IN THE WRONG BUTTON.

Q: ALL RIGHT. SO ONE WAS WRONG. SO THE OTHER FOUR WERE -- WHO WERE THE FOUR OFFICERS YOU WERE CALLING?

A: UMM, I BELIEVE ONE OF THEM WAS A FEMALE NAMED JAMIE VERMAAT.

Q: JAMIE WHO?

A: VERMAAT.

Q: COULD YOU SPELL THAT FOR THE COURT REPORTER?

A: V-E-R-M-A-A-T.

Q: DID YOU REACH HER?

A: NO.

Q: DID YOU CALL HER HOME?

A: YES.

Q: ALL RIGHT. WHO ELSE DID YOU CALL?

A: CALLED A DETECTIVE PAMELA HARRIS.

Q: AND WHERE DOES SHE WORK?

A: H-A-R-R -- OR WHERE DOES SHE WORK?

Q: YES. WELL -- SORRY. LET ME LET YOU FINISH SPELLING IT FIRST. H-A-R-R-I-S?

A: YES.

Q: WHERE DOES SHE WORK?

A: RIGHT NOW, SHE'S WORKING IN SAN PEDRO ON THE HARBOR DIVISION.

Q: BUT AT THAT TIME, WHERE DID SHE WORK?

A: WORKED WEST LOS ANGELES DETECTIVES.

Q: DID YOU REACH HER?

A: YES.

Q: DID SHE RESPOND TO THE LOCATION?

A: NO.

Q: YOU CALLED HER, YOU REACHED HER, SHE DIDN'T RESPOND?

A: WELL, LET ME EXPLAIN WHY WE WERE CALLING THESE INDIVIDUALS UP. WE HAD A PROGRAM IN WEST L.A. AT THAT TIME THAT IF WE HAD A HOMICIDE, WE WOULD TAKE PEOPLE THAT HAD NO HOMICIDE EXPERIENCE AT ALL OUT TO A HOMICIDE SCENE AND HAVE THEM JUST VISUALLY WALK WITH US AND SEE WHAT WE WERE DOING AS A TRAINING EXERCISE SO THEY WOULD GET HOMICIDE EXPERIENCE. SO THESE PEOPLE THAT I WERE CALLING AT THIS TIME WERE THESE PEOPLE THAT WERE ON THIS LIST. THEY HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO COME IN WHATSOEVER BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT ON CALL. IF IT TURNS OUT TO BE OKAY FOR THEM AND THEY HAVEN'T BEEN DOING ANYTHING THE NIGHT BEFORE AND THEY'VE GOTTEN PLENTY OF SLEEP, THEY WANT TO COME IN, THEY CAN COME IN. IF THEY DON'T WANT TO COME IN, I CAN'T MAKE THEM COME IN. THEY DON'T WORK MY UNIT.