[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: bobaugust
Date: Wednesday August 16, 2006
Time: 10:04:33 PM
Solitairea1, Phillips never testifed in the preliminary hearing. When Phillips was questioned by Cochran in the criminal tiral he never said he wasn't Furhman's partner. He explained what kind of partners he and Furhman were. February 16. 1996 Q ALL RIGHT. AS I UNDERSTAND IT, PRIOR TO THAT TIME, SINCE '91, THE TWO OF YOU HAD BEEN PARTNERS; IS THAT CORRECT? A WELL, PARTNERS IN THAT WE WORK THE ROBBERY TABLE TOGETHER. THERE WAS FOUR OF US THAT WORKED THE ROBBERY TABLE. I HAD BUSINESSES AND FOLLOW-HOME ROBBERIES ON ONE SIDE OF THE TABLE WITH A PARTNER. MARK FUHRMAN HAD STREET ROBBERIES AND CARJACKING ROBBERIES AND HE SAT DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM ME ON THE OTHER TABLE AND HE HAD A PARTNER. THERE WAS FOUR OF US THAT WORKED THAT TABLE. Q SO WHEN YOU SAY "TABLE" YOU MEAN KIND OF LIKE A DESK OR A TABLE? A FIVE TABLES -- FIVE DESKS ALTOGETHER RUN BY A ROBBERY COORDINATOR. Q IN WEST LOS ANGELES? A IN WEST LOS ANGELES. Q SO THERE WAS A PERIOD OF TIME WHERE YOU AND DETECTIVE FUHRMAN WERE PARTNERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH SOME OTHER DETECTIVES WHO WORKED THERE ALSO; IS THAT RIGHT? A YES. Q ALL RIGHT. A AND WE HELPED EACH OTHER OUT ON THEIR CASES. IF HE NEEDED SOME HELP ON HIS CASES, THEN ME AND MY PARTNER WOULD HELP HIM AND VISA-VERSA SO WE DID WORK CASES TOGETHER, BUT HE WOULD HELP ME OUT ON MY CASES. Q ALL RIGHT. I UNDERSTAND THAT. A OKAY. bobaugust