[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jasper
Date: Friday, August 03, 2007
Time: 12:59:01 AM
Jean, I agree. She was the last person I expected to go the way she did. I don't think she even remembers the TAINTED evidence in the case that sent up red flags with her during O.J.’s criminal trial. She used to look at the evidence, listen to the testimony and give HER reasons for thinking the way she did about it. Now she just repeats the “popular wisdom” of Fox regardless of what the evidence and testimony (which can be checked) really was. And Mark Fuhrman? ………. To hear what she has to say about the blood evidence, in the pointing finger photo, in the Bronco, on the Rockingham glove, the socks, the back gate and pathway leading to Nicole’s back gate, you’d think she never heard of Fuhrman or Roberts. Yet, she refers to “Mark” and defers to him as though he were the greatest detective who ever lived. –Jasper