[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jean
Date: 16 Sep 2005
Time: 11:27:23 AM
It "ain't" us!!! We all agree that OJ could not have done the murder with many facts to back that up. We disagree at the point of who did it or why they did it, because we do not have enough facts to come to a 100% conclusion. I keep going back to the Liza Borden case because it is erily similar. The people who knew who it was either did not tell it for some good reason or where so intimidated that they did not talk. The missing pieces or facts that put it together was that Borden had an illigitimate son that those who knew about had a good reason not to mention. The second fact was that he had made a new will disinheriting his children which was the reason that they did not tell. If they had told about the son then the prosecution would have brought up the will. The prosecutors played the game for political reasons. The defense went along to protect the income of the children, Liza, her sister and the illigitimate brother. Liza took the fall so that she and her sister would have an income. The jury was probably rigged also. Liza was guilty of a cover up and may well have known in advance that the murder would be committed. Or she may not have known and only the uncle knew. But one of them did as they made sure the sister was out of the country or state forgot which and the uncle had an iron clad aliby. She was guilty of obstruction of justice, but not of murder.