[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: bobaugust
Date: 21 Sep 2005
Time: 07:57:04 PM
Jasper, you're specifics are wrong. Contradicted by what was actually said. This will happen every time you rely on any opinion from Prien. Funny Preliminary Hearing July 8, 1994 MR. SHAPIRO: We're going to ask for a stipulation regarding the phone records that were presented in open court from the phone call from Mrs. Brown to Nicole, which I believe was at 10:17. THE COURT: And is there -- is there going to be a problem with that? MS. CLARK: If that's what the records say, there will be no problem with that. But which record? MR. SHAPIRO: Phone records from the telephone company that you gave us. MS. CLARK: I'm going to have to locate it. I'll locate it and make sure. THE COURT: With reference to defense exhibits that were received for purposes of the motion only, do you wish to offer any of those -- or will you be offering any of those with regard to the case? MR. SHAPIRO: Yes, yes. We'll be offering all of them. THE COURT: Okay. Let's see if there's anything else. MS. CLARK: Counsel, just so I can make sure. You're saying it was a phone call from Nicole Brown to her mother or from the mother to Nicole? MR. SHAPIRO: From the mother to Nicole. THE COURT: Okay. Then I guess that's it. I just wanted to know where we stood. You can transcribe this, but until I'm sure about the stipulation, then this is sealed. If the stipulation is agreed to by everyone, then I don't have any problem with this portion of the transcript being released. Let me explain this again for Prien. There was no 10:17 telephone call. If there was a 10:17 telephone call from Juditha to Nicole then there would have been a defense stipulation to it since both sides agreed to it. The defense never made that stipulation They were mistaken. bobaugust