[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Kate
T1:
Category 3: Category 1
Date: 09 Aug 1999
Time: 03:42:32
Remote Name: pm429.isomedia.com
Terry:
In rereading my last post to you, I did not explain something else about how important reading and the re-reading of the testimony.
You can always tell when Clark and the DA's were trying to hide an answer, their objections were perfectly time. Also, you realized just how great Clark and Darden were on jumping on only parts of what witness said.
Perfect example, in Lange's testimony, he was asked it looked like Ron was wearing a ring that night, that there was evidence Ron was wearing ring, he said he "believed so". Well believing so and it being so are two different things.
Yet, we have Faye claiming that it was Nicole's ring and asking the question, "how did Nicole's thump ring fly off?"
The Goldmans denied getting a ring back, so who's ring is it and where is it?
Kate