[ Home | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jasper
Date: 3/22/01
Time: 3:26:05 PM
Jolana,
You are absolutely right. That's what's making me crazy. Why is the possible Fuhrman connection to Wasz so hard for everybody else to see?
Long before it occurred to me to write a book like Iago I worked up a profile of the killer (if it wasn't O.J.) that included so many minority traits, specialized skills and improbable contacts that O.J. looked guilty as hell. I did not follow the preliminary hearing and I didn't have a good grasp of who the key players were until the criminal trial began and O.J. pleaded not guilty. It sounded absurd.
Like Joe Bosco I could see how he was framed and I could not see how he could have done it the way the prosecution claimed he did. But "somehow" I figured it must have been him because I couldn't she how anyone could fit ALL seventy or eighty-something of the oddball profile points I came up with. I gave up listing them when the list got too long and the improbable contacts became way too improbable. Fuhrman has them all - but only if you include someone like Wasz.
The killer needed different people to do things that he and his partner could not take a chance on doing. He needed someone with no recorded links to him to do some of the surveillance and to procure some to the items that would be associated with O.J. (O.J.'s hair or fingerprints, for example from Paula Barbiari's SUV). It had to be someone that he had life and death control over and someone who could be disposed of without attracting attention if necessary after Nicole was killed and O.J. was framed. To satisfy those concerns, you can't do better than a thief and a junky like William Wasz.