[ Home | Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Kari
Date: 4/17/01
Time: 3:11:16 AM
The one theory that can not be disputed is when one looks at this to see if O.J. did it or not. He did not have sufficient time to commit this crime and then physically react to it and then be seen at around eleven appearing a bit warm, but not upset, nor shaking, nor emotional. He didn't appear worried about anything but getting to his flight on time. Everyone else was acting a bit odd, but maybe they always did. O.J. Simpson's explanation of his activities that night hardley leave room for doubt. They found golf balls where he said that he chipped them to. The one thing I will never understand is how anyone can possibly believe such a bloody mess could have been committed by someone with no blood on them nor the physical appearance of most suspects brought in for this sort of grusome crime, for example, the sight of Larry Singleton in Florida shortly after the Bundy murders. Blood all over him. Not many people who cause blood to be split can walk away with no blood on them. Not logical. There was also not enough blood at the crime scene for the crimes to have been committed as said. I am glad that others are finally bringing this forth. No offense to anyone but a theory as to the killers is not relevant when the point is to show that O.J. Simpson didn't do it. In this case, theories of who did do it depend on evidence that cannot be relied on as being left by the killer. Nothing said by the Prosecution can be taken as the truth. Some of the defense evidence was not fully explored. The Deposition tells us who lied during the criminal trial and who didn't. O.J. Simpson's witnesses win that one hands down. Except those who went to the plaintiffs which makes me wonder who these people really are. The French guy I know several people have spoken to. They have had Web Pages and written about speaking to this man who's dog who was so old he could barely make the walk still alive and reported to be in better shape than the man said. Of course those web pages are down now. So many are. The problem with theories is that when evidence gets in the way we discount it so our theories don't get blown away. This is why I prefer to see what shows O.J. Simpson is innocent. Time, Demeanor, and no blood nor bruises on his person. No real motive. No evidence worth believing as the blood evidence has no clear nor convincing chain of custody. One cannot believe the Prosecution in any area.