Iago (May) Discussion

[ Home | Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]

Re: The OTHER Front Door

From: Kari
Date: 5/6/01
Time: 3:13:15 AM

Comments

By obscuring this door as open it made the idea of anyone else getting into the house seem more unreal. This means the police knew they were lying and framing an innocent man. I just don't want to jump at something that may be nothing more than a red herring. I don't say it is unimportant. I simply say it is in Catagory three, something hidden obviously for a reason. It can easily be moved into Catagory four once it is shown to not be a Red Herring. We have been plodding along well for a long time now and most people think it is for our own entertainment. I find it interesting that Glen Rogers or Redgers strangled or drowned his victims in the bathtub and then cut them up, that this man obsessed with the Black Dahlia murders had these nightmares of Beth Short being cut up in a bathtub and we get this inference from Riske that he couldn't see into the tub and something about why he couldn't see into the water made him want to see if bodies were in it, then the shock that the kids were in the house. In Black Dahlia the body is discovered by a woman pushing her child in a stroller of the time. So many things that could have been taken from the files of one case from 1947 to cover up the truth of current case in 1994. I don't discount the importance of this front door, but Johnny Cochran did bring out that this door existed in the Criminal Trial and asked the police why? They said that it was clearly not used as a front door so they made it a window. Not exact words, but a summary of what quickly came and went. I often think surprises in this case came after stuff like this happened for one of two reasons. Either most people would never hear of it till later and then not believe it as most of the criminal trial case when spoken of is not believed, or else for the first purpose and so that people like us who remember things like a dark picture of candles in the windows being shown in open court either in front of the jury or not in front of the jury and the mystery of the door to make us stop and wonder why they hid the door. Of course a third reason, they were hiding it with help from the defense. One thing I need to know, is Nicole did what they said why is that door forty feet down the walk and still a closed in area? Forty feeth is a long way and isn't that between the two staircases. Some pictures have her between the two staircases and some have her in front of the first one. It makes no sense. Also the picture of the candles in the window shows Rokar got there really early and the inside of the house was a crime scene and then they changed the declaration to not include the inside of the house. WHY?

Last changed: October 26, 2004