[ Home | Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Kari
Date: 5/8/01
Time: 8:38:26 PM
Isn't it possible that what Sydney heard was just after a telephone call after the killers arrived? The knife on the counter also indicates a form of sadistic mental torture as a killer goes through a victim's knives choosing which he wishes to use. I found it odd that the knife found in the blouse and ruled irrelevant by Judge Ito because it had clearly been planted was not checked with Nicole's kitchen knives. They made major assumptions that boggles the mind of me,a layman. I wonder why the Television Attorney's didn't question why the defense nor Prosecution didn't check it to see if it was indeed one of Nicole's knives. This alone would cause questions to be asked. The house should have never been allowed to be emptied untill criminal trial was over. In fact the cleaning of that house was obstruction of justice. The "defense" did not have the ability to face accuser, the house contents themselves. Speak of hiding things this is a major. What was in Nicole's house that has been hidden? This is why it is so easy to believe how I do about the LAPD. Imagine the FACT that Andrew Cuananan killed his first victims with a knife and using torture. I believe he did the same to the businessman as well. I wish they had not illegally allowed Nicole's Condo to be declared not part of the crimescene when she was killed right outside the front door. The belief of the position of the home and position of the bodies, all of these things add up to created crime scene. No wonder there was so little evidence to indicate another murderer. They say they looked no where but O.J. Simpson.