[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Junot
Date: 5/31/01
Time: 8:47:21 PM
Remote Name: 209.181.90.102
{she wrote:].
Remember, too, that there is a big street light right across from where it was allegedly parked. For years, I imagined Parks driving around in the dark looking for signs of life at the Rockingham house when in fact right where he was looking for the street number and where the Bronco is allegedly parked is a big old street light.
Sorry, Charlie, but that "big old streetlight" you mention was actually at the corner of Rockingham and Ashford, AND there was a large tree gfrowing between it and the Rockingham gate. Therefore that particular street light gave little, if any, light to where the Bronco was parked. See wagnerandson.com "what Park saw" section for details.
And actually Parks said the other dark vehicle was parked to the side (right) of the Bentley and he never did say he was wrong about seeing it.
he said it was behind the Bentley. But it's a small thing, because this "second car" definitely wasn't there. If it had been where Park pervceived it to be, he wouldn't have been able to maneuver a 21-foot limousine through that right-hand turn down the driveway without being very slow and careful and doing a lot of backing-and-turning that he would have definitely remembered the next day. ...
And it is the way (turned left) that Parks did when he left to go to the airport.
The dog walker at 9:40 or so on OJ's street didn't see it either.
Considering that, as I've said, the Bronco parking space was in pitch dark, that the "witness" never got closer than a half a block or so, and that he had no reason to make note of the Bronco or its absence, I, for one, say his tesitimony is worthless.
Last changed: May 31, 2001