[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: charie
Date: 7/1/01
Time: 7:24:24 PM
Now that people are seeing what he wrote, is it just me? or is he admitting to some things that were denied in the trial?
Shoeprints on the walkway amongst the paw prints. They tried to make Dr. Lee out a fool for suggesting this. In Lee's book he says he believes that their are shoeprints out there but was never shown good enough pix to pin it down.
Also, it is an admission to being in the scene at 4:30--something he denied and then in the civil trial others tried to deny FOR him.
We have talked before about what Fuhrman choses to stress and what he choses to leave out. He mentions Nicole's clean feet.
And I don't know that he could tell that rigor was setting in by looking. But he definitely mentions it. This is 6 1/2 hours after the alleged 10:30 or so murders.
A BIG issue in the civil trial was the lack of blood around Ron and on his body actually for the amt of blood that he lost according to the autopsy.
Where is that blood? Out on the walkway I'd say if it is anywhere.
If could well be that the blood halfway down the walkway business and then went all the way down throughout the night was bogus.
I hate to get gruesome here but I recently saw some real life photos of decapitations in the crime scene. And you know what? There was no blood at all. It was quick and there was an immediate stopping of the heart which was not the case with NIcole BUT there was NO (none, nada, zip) drainage from the wounds either.
And the topper is the comment about the sweet smelling blood. Huh?
charlie