Home | Contents | Search Iago Conspirators Timeline Junot
From: Junot
Date: 2/4/02
Time: 9:32:45 PM
Jolana wrote:
"Why then would you not consider that he at least had help or was just an accomplice?"
"Seems to me that given some of your interesting findings regarding KATO, many more people might begin to see the logic of your conclusions."
Jolana"
Jolana:
First, I have always said -- and it should be obvious -- that he used Ferarra as a 'patsy'. He had met her about three months before while both were working on a movie (which aparently never was completed; I certainly never heard of it being released). My speculation is that he quickly found out she was "ditzy" when it came to issues of time and duration. BTW, I also had a private source on information about Kaelin -- now dead -- who tole me that Kaelin was a very time-conscious and prompt person, and even own a sports watch that seemed much too expensive for someone in his situation.
Second, we are not talking here about negotiable things; we are not, for instance, dickering over a car. We are talking about a specific incident in history. This incident only happened once, and it happened in one and only one way.
I beleive and asert that I have found out what really happened and can describe it (and did once, and shall do so again later). By that, I mean that, if you had a sci-fi time machine and a video camera, and went back to the murder night and the area, you would see almost exactly what I describe.
THERE IS NO ROOM FOR COMPROMISE ON SOMETHING LIKE THIS. While there might be a small amount of "fudge factor" of five minmutes or so on each of the various items in my scenario, but, since the block of time for the crime as a whole is strictly limited, all that would mean is that some other part of my scenario took place five or so minutes soone or later than I hypothesized in order to 'compensate'.
if people are going to see "the logic of my conclusions", then they will accept it 'whole hog' or reject it completely.