Home | Contents | Search Iago Conspirators Timeline Junot
From: charlie
Date: 2/19/02
Time: 9:13:05 AM
Jasper, Exactly right on all points.
But as I said in my post, it works both ways. The knit cap fibers would have come off on OJ (in real life).
We had the same sort of situation with the Bronco fibers, the blue-black fibers, and Ron and Nicole's hair. Regardless of how much (and there was a LOT) of the fibers and hairs were on EVERYTHING at the crime scene--not one single fiber from clothing or hair from the victims was found in OJ's Bronco (although hair was "transported" allegedly in the car on the wet bloody glove.
I thought the knit cap had some blood on it but I am not at all sure so I won't dispute that. BUT in REALITY, had someone been wearing that cap for the murders, it Should have had a good deal of blood on it. As well as the clothing that they were wearing. No matter about the claim that someone could have done this without getting bloody, the FACT is that blood was "spattered" everywhere in the caged area on the fence. And anybody who has bled at all knows that "movement" of any kind will "sling" blood everywhere. Not to mention the "spurting" nature of a cut. We don't even have blood smears on the driver's seat alleged made by blood on the clothing in this case.
I want to remind everybody how if you study some major murder cases (serial killers, etc.) you find that in all cases they are lucky to "find" one fiber or one hair of the killer although he carried the bodies, wrestled around with them or fought with them, perhaps even raped them, etc. In the Tampa case, they found a couple of car carpet fibers in about 15 cases. Not all the victims had car carpet fiber although the killer had abducted them in his car, made them lie down on the carpet, etc.
And remember, none of this hair and fiber was found at OJ's house either.
charlie