|
Death on the Nile
The
He managed to get both bloody gloves into his movie with a front page newspaper photo of O.J. holding them up in court. He used the number 22 four times, twice unnecessarily and once inaccurately. He referred to the Skakels as “Kennedys.” He borrowed enough from so many identifiable movie and TV sources to write a book with scores of pictures and relevant quotes that spill into many more Picture Gallery pages.
The thumps theory has a noteworthy difference. It takes the pieces that make it up from only one movie set mainly in the Egypt of the late 1930s. You need to do little more than substitute “gloves” for “guns” and “thumps” for “shots” to assemble the entire phony alibi scenario. Even those elements come mostly from parts of Death on the Nile grafted onto other parts with minor tweaks to relate them to O.J., the gloves and the thumps.
For starters, Death on the Nile involves a love triangle, a betrayal, a staged fight, a bleeding killer, a missing murder weapon, a clever time shifting trick, and killers planting evidence to make it appear that someone else framed one of them.
In the first scene
Early
Mi
Jackie creates a motive for killing Simon and Linnet Doyle by openly stalking and harassing them in the most outrageous places on their honeymoon in Egypt. It’s part of a plan to make it appear that someone is trying to frame Jackie when someone discovers Linnet’s dead body. The passengers aboard the honeymooner’s ship include an armchair revolutionary, a German doctor, an alcoholic novelist and her daughter, a crooked lawyer, a rich American widow obsessed with Linnets pearls and her paid British companion/nurse. All of them have motives to kill Linnet and from the evidence left by the people who do kill her, Poirot is able to devise credible guilt scenarios for all of them. He can’t do it for Simon or Jackie because they seem to have unassailable alibis.
Simon and Jackie stage a verbal fight in the ship’s saloon that s
Jackie, who flung the gun away from her, looks as devastated emotionally by what she did as
With
Lying on the sofa, Simon uses the fur stole to muffle the sound of the third spent round. He fires this bullet into his leg through the stole to muffle the sound and to give him a real .22- caliber bullet wound. He uses a fresh handkerchief to cover it. He takes one spent round from the Derringer, tosses it through a porthole into the river and replaces it with a fresh round. He does this to guard against the unlikely event that the gun he’s going to throw into the river will be found. To minimize the chances of that happening, he puts the gun in the fur stole along with the ink-stained handkerchief, and a marble ashtray to weigh down all of the incriminating evidence.
As in every real complex plan of action and believably fictional plans involving people who don’t always behave predictably, something goes wrong.
Three things go wrong.
The murder conspirators were right in anticipating that someone might find the gun and handkerchief wrapped in the stole. The ship’s Egyptian onboard manager supervises the search. He is wearing gloves when he gleefully hands the wet bundle to Poirot and his English friend Col. Race (David Niven).
No harm done unless the red stain on the handkerchief is checked for blood. Never mind fingerprints, which for some inscrutable reason are never addressed in the movie although the killers never wiped off anything and did not wear gloves.
Linnet’s maid who should have been in her quarters on the other side of the ship was walking on
She blackmails him in front of Poirot and Col. Race, using plausible deniability language that only Simon would recognize for what it is... Big problem.
Simon gives Jackie the decoded message. First she takes a sharp knife from the German surgical case that he left in the saloon with Simon. She then goes to the maid’s cabin on the pretense of paying her off. When the maid is distracted by the money in her hand Jackie slits her throat from behind and puts the knife back where she got it. The next murder/frame-up is also Jackie’s improvised work. Angela Lansbury as Salome Otterbourne, the dipsomaniacal novelist, sees Jackie leaving the maid’s cabin. When she hears of this murder she goes to the saloon where Poirot, Race and the doctor are gathered around Simon. When she announces that she knows who the killer is, Simon stalls her by insisting in a loud voice that she start from the beginning and tell everything. Jackie’s cabin is on the other side of the wall. Simon’s loud talk is to alert her to the emergency. She gets the message, runs to the lawyer’s cabin and steals his revolver. She dashes back to the saloon. Standing outside the open door concealed by door curtains, shoots Salome in the forehead, drops the smoking gun and darts into her cabin.
Poirot
The clincher for me in determining that Death on the Nile was the master template for an O.J. phony alibi theory intended to explain the thumps on Kato’s wall as well as matching bloody gloves goes back to the discovery of Jackie’s gun.
Rewind to the Egyptian ship manager wearing gloves while handing his wet bundle of evidence to Poirot and Race....
Race notes that the murder weapon is a four-barreled (four coins), .22-calibur (22 cents) Derringer (the type of weapon used to murder President Lincoln). Poirot notes that the red stain on the handkerchief has the water-soaked characteristics of red ink.
Rewind to Bette Davis as Marie Van Schuyler, the wealthy American widow, trying to describe to Poirot and Race the odd sound she heard from inside her cabin on the night that Linnet Doyle was murdered.
Van Schuyler: I was awakened by a popping sound.
Race: Popping sound?
Van Schuyler: Exactly. Like a Champagne cork coming out of a bottle. An indifferent Champagne, you understand, not a great vintage. That makes a much more discrete sound.
Race: Could it have been a small pistol shot rather than a Champagne cork?
Van Schuyler: Possibly.
This is all about the quality of sound and the force that produces it. You might recall that although four shots were fired on the ship at different times, the combined total of witnesses heard three shots. Squeezing the Death on the Nile shots that were heard into the same timeframe as the three thumps Kato reported on the other side of his wall makes a close parallel. The most important thing, though, is the guessing game, the inability of the witness to say what caused the sound on the other side of a wall.
Rewind from there to what Poirot says to Mrs. Van Schuyler that begins the string of events culminating in the discovery of the .22 and other incriminating evidence.
He says, “Your cabin is next to Mrs. Doyle?
She says, “It is.” He says, “Did you hear anything strange late last night?” By the way, you can pick out the killer in two other movies based on Agatha Christie books, Murder Is Easy and Murder She Said without following any of the clues. All you have to do is look for the character other than the chauffer wearing leather gloves. |