[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jasper
Date: 11/25/2004
Time: 5:08:15 PM
Buster, ………..Kardashian didn’t smoke, drink or take illegal narcotics on religious grounds. It therefore seems highly unlikely to me that he would buy coke for his girlfriends, especially in a public place as William Wasz said he did. Even if his abstention from these vices was only a front, he couldn’t keep up the front by having anything to do with buying cocaine for anybody. Given the absences of witnesses who saw Wasz, Kardashian and O.J. in the same bar where Joe confirmed all of them were at the same time, it seems likely to me that Wasz was there, not to sell coke to either of them, but to watch them. ………You can’t accept any part of Wasz’s story without accepting the source and buying every part connected to it. It’s a package deal involving Nicole, O.J., Paula and Kardashian. That’s why I urge everyone who hasn’t read the passage from Wasz’s post on the Peking Duck that Ludwig quoted in a thread below to read it. ………There is no doubt that O.J. bought cocaine for himself and Nicole in the1980s and no evidence or testimony that he did so in the ’90s. There has never been any evidence or testimony that Robert Kardashian ever bought drugs for anyone. All we have there is the word of William Wasz and Kardashian’s name and phone number in his notebook along with O.J.’s and Paula’s, and a chronology of Nicole’s activities on two days in January ’94. It doesn’t prove that Wasz knew any of them. It does prove that he had a working interest in all of them. A man hired to keep tabs on all of them would have a working interest in them, too, which would merit a place for them in the same notebook. ……….The idea that O.J. would send a message to the imprisoned Wasz in 1998 telling him that his friends killed Nicole over a drug debt of any amount fits into Wasz’s claim that Kardashian had connections to illegal drug trafficking. It also rings hollow. Why would O.J. do that? Why would O.J. add that he was at Bundy WITH HIS SON after the murders and accidentally left his shoeprints in blood? Why is the heel print, only a few inches from the cap and glove in Fuhrman’s pointing finger photo, so crisp and clear and the shoeprints leading to the rear of the condo so complete? Why does O.J.’s shoe size mean something here while Fuhrman’s shoe size doesn’t? ………Why do ALL of the “shoeprints” in Wasz’s stories take us away from Mark Fuhrman while so much of what Joe Bosco found on his own takes us to him? –Jasper