[ Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jasper
Date: 6/5/03
Time: 6:57:49 PM
Remote User:
Charlie,
The photos were supposedly taken on September 26, 1993 for a Buffalo Bills fan club newsletter. http://www.smartfellowspress.com/Iago/Iago-pdf/iago32.pdf (page 513) and http://www.smartfellowspress.com/Iago/Iago-pdf/iago36.pdf (page 595). Where were the Bruno Magli Lorenzos “in the newsletter” when they weren’t being photographed in Buffalo, New York or stamping their “signature” in blood in Brentwood, California?
The studio in England that processed the photos in 1996 was one of only a few in the world at that time that could do the digital manipulation of photo images required for technically undetectable fakes. You can do the same thing yourself today with a good drawing program that only costs a few hundred bucks IF you have a good enough background in photography to tell you where to put the shadows. In 1996 that kind of equipment was so rare and expensive that O.J.’s photo expert didn’t know it existed.
So, here we have O.J. walking around in a pair of rare shoes (boots) in September of 1993, footwear that was discontinued nine months earlier. Nine months after the photos were taken the distinctive treads show up in blood on the scene of a double homicide with no indication that they had ever been worn before. The shoes disappear forever, but over a year after the murders, photos of O.J. wearing them appear in the National Enquirer.
The photos were taken by a 20-year-old guy name Harry Scull. He had a friend about his age name E.J. Flammer who was also a photographer. Scull’s photos were not clear enough for a positive identification of the shoes. Up pops a lawyer who calls the plaintiffs’ attorneys in the wrongful death lawsuit against O.J. with much, much better photos of the shoes. He represents a man named Lynch, the Public Relations Director for the Buffalo Bills and the man who puts out the Bills fan club newsletter….
John, this is the equivalent of the redheaded dwarf with a yellow necktie giving a 500-dollar bill to a Lithuanian bartender named Joe. If the photos where faked what would it have taken to fake them? It would take people with rare characteristics – special skills, special access, a close working relationship to each other, etc. Did the people associated with those photos match the list of qualifications for forgeries that even an expert couldn’t prove were fakes? http://www.smartfellowspress.com/Iago/Iago-pdf/iago-app.pdf (Flammer page 645-646 / Lynch page 660 / McCelroy page 662 / Munson page 664). The answer is a resounding YES! –Jasper