[ Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jasper
Date: 6/13/03
Time: 11:26:31 PM
Remote User:
John,
You know nothing about scale and proportion. You know nothing about building models to precise engineering specifications. You don’t now what those precise tolerances and angles mean or what they tell you about the LIMITED POSSIBILITIES for the resulting design (the way the part HAS TO LOOK to function). The same principles apply to pulling the Bronco out of the driveway and parking it in the precise spot where it was parked. "Within a foot" won't get it. Coming from anywhere other than the driveway, the driver would have to have decades of professional experience to make a calculation precise enough (angle, distance from curb and distance from driveway) to hit all three of the right marks. You can reject this as fraud (ignore the photos and my diagrams). But if you don’t give “authoritative” reasons for doing it, why should anyone believe you?
You know nothing about the 1994 Ford Bronco’s critical dimensions, overall length, overhang, wheelbase, turning radius, H-point (you don’t even know what an H-point is) or anything that a Master Modeler at Ford Motor Company would know to make the calculation that I made in 1997. You’re still using the prosecution diagram of the Rockingham estate so you don’t even have the basic information you need to make a rational judgment if you did know what you were talking about – which you don’t.
For those of you who don’t know John and me, let me assure you that I am not angry with him. I’m just trying to speak his language (I think he likes it.)….
Try this experiment. If you don’t have a driveway, find one. Back into it then pull out and park straight in at a slight angle a few inches from the curb (the angle of O.J.’s driveway to the curb made a natural 2-degree angle). Mark your tire locations on the ground with chalk. Now drive around the block and see how close you come to those marks. Anything more than a half inch off from side to side and six inches from front to rear is a miss.
As for this – “total bullshit, second only to your recent statment that there was no evidence for several people having been in OJ's house…” What are you talking about? Please copy and post it so that everyone can see it.
I state my expertise to give the source of my relevant conclusions. If you can't respect that or you want me to pretend that I’m too brilliant to require special training, I can't do anything about it. The closest I can come is to make it as simple for you to check as I can. But as soon as I do that and the solution is obvious to you, it becomes irrelevant.
You give an ounce of peanuts and demand a pound of gold. Your website consists of 49 pages in 12 point type with 1 ½ inch margins. Most of it is groundless speculation. All of it is superficial (your idea of hard work). When is the last time you looked at it? If you can’t flip thorough Iago and see where the e-mails begin and end, how would it help to put them in the appendix? Finding things easily is what the website is for. Iago was on the web over a year before it was in print.
The rest of your post? Total bullshit second to none. –Jasper