[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jean
Date: 5/29/03
Time: 3:36:19 PM
Remote Name: 209.240.198.60
The more I think about this the bigger I think it is. Now for the coroner and all those people who saw the body to have tried to hide the most obvious thing about the body, they had to get the word from a pretty powerful source.
As the media over the last few hours has tried to come up with how the noose (with a knot) could have gotten there and how Scott must be a real monster to have strangled his baby, I can see they where given the word.
They would start backing off instead of saying things that don't pass the laught test. And as far as ratings go, they would be even bigger with a trial of satinests than just a husband. Only The famous crime guy whose name starts with an S. (blanked on it) is holding his ground that the noose had to have been placed there before the body was put in the water. Cyril Whick ? not S. Cyril is right.
They would not be doing all this just to cover for a few bikers. It is someone big they are covering for.
By the way, the baby was not strangled. As the neck bones where intact. They could have hung the baby up for some reason and then the tape was so tight they could not easily get it off.