[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From:
Date: 3/9/03
Time: 12:45:56 AM
Remote Name: 205.188.209.106
Jasper,
You wrote in part:
"Fuhrman always has a story to tell but he does not have the imagination to tell it without borrowing heavily from other source (mostly television and the movies). He is very good at taking someone else’s story and shaping it to fit his. He is very good at planting suggestions (blood IN the Bronco, bleeding killer, Bronco parked at “extreme angle,” etc.) that show up in somebody else’s recollections or interpretations of what they saw.
"For the life of me I can’t figure out why some people don’t see the pattern. I can’t see why they don’t distinguish between simple errors that all of us make and the “errors” Fuhrman makes CONSISTENTLY at all the right junctures to obscure what he knows. That’s why I’ve pounded so hard on the scale and proportion of the Rockingham layout. Fuhrman is an artist. He KNOWS the importance of getting the proportions right. Yet, he makes a drawing that is deliberately and unnecessarily out of proportion – in all the right places to make the truth seem like a fairytale at worst just another theory at best. "
Fuhrman is like that because he is a "very good cop," by which I don't mean he is a good guy, but that he is the very mold of a modern day cop.
I was once struck by what an NYPD lieutenant told me when we were trying to account for a screw up regarding statistics they had provided that got into a report. It was no big deal, but it was still an error.
The cops advice was, "Just remember, if we stick to the story, nobody gets hurt."
There it is. The story. I was trying to account for what happened so we could avoid it. What he was telling me was that it didn't matter what happened, as long as we made up a story that accounted for it and stuck to it.
That's what cops are all about. Everything they do is a "story." What's the story. The story, of cou4rse, is what explains that this guy did it and why. Doesn't matter if its true, as long as it works. If it's also true, that's great, but not important as long as it works.
That's also how they coordinate and organize all their covers ups. They ask each other "what's the story," and follow whatever line is laid down.
Since the whole job of a cop is to account for how the evidcence they collect points to somebody as the bad guy, they constantly have to be able to produce a "story" that account for their "evidence."
Fuhrman is very good at coming up with story a story line that accounts for whatever evidence they happened to decide to use for fingering a suspect. And they don't have any trouble getting rid of stuff that hurts the story, and making up stuff that moves it along.
Fuhrman is a smart guy. He does well at making up stories and following the line. That's his strength. He can also tell what will work and what won't. Good guy to have around in a case like this.
Trouble with your theory is that Fuhrman might be able to make up good sto0ries, but he lacked the proper to rig the evidence and stage the crime scene and commit the murders in a way that fits with the story they made up to frame Simpson. That was done by others. As was the juice necessary to generatre the cover up for the frame up.
Prien