[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: [email protected]
Date: 3/11/03
Time: 12:16:36 AM
Remote Name: 205.188.209.14
Japser wrote in part:
"'Interrogation Text' is Fuhrman’s title for Lange and Vannatter’s interrogation. By avoiding the word 'transcript' he makes it possible to argue that his written copy of the interview came from Lange and Vannatter’s transcript rather than directly from the tapes. By changing the format of Lange and Vannatter’s transcript so conspicuously, he also made it possible to argue that he made his own transcript directly from the tapes. I’m not surprised that you found his 'text' close enough to Vannatter and Lange’s “transcript” for them to appear to 'track.' In this sort of word game, it has to be as close as possible to the real thing to slip in a few unnoticed changes that have a major impact overall."
That was my point. His description of the wording makes clear it is not a transcription of the recording while it is in the form that makes it appear it is.
Of course he is being deceptive.
The transcript is worthless as an accurate rendition of what occurred, as is the allegedly official transcript in L&V for reasons others have alfready stated.
It's a cerainty that's one reason Clark refused to use it. They would Have been rerquired to authenticafre the tape, and the ffort to do so would have proven they doctored it.
it's just one more example of the massive fraud that occurred in this case that is vastly beyond Fuhrman's poor capabilites to plan or implement.
He was merely an actor in the drama. Liked the many personages who had their roles to play in the JFK hit.
Prien