[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: [email protected]
Date: 3/15/03
Time: 1:00:53 AM
Remote Name: 152.163.188.40
Jasper wrote:
You didn't read my post. Try it again. --Jasper
I can't find another post I sent after the one to which you wrote that response.
This is my last comment on this topic.
Your first question was what information your editing hid.
Since the only thing you in fact did was correct my typos, that is the only fact to be addressed. Now, the question is what did that fact hide. There is only ONE THING that your editing directly hid from anyone - my bad typing.
Now bad typing can occur for many reasons. Carelessness. Bad typing form resulting in many mistakes. The sensitivity of keyboards registering letters that someone who learned typing on manual typrwriters would not be as sensitive as those who worked only keyboards. Hastiness. Bad speller. Horrendous grammarian.
All of those possibilities were hidden by your typo corrections.
Now which of these many possibilities is the correct one that you wanted me to hit upon? Who the fuck knows.
It's the heart of a circumstantial case. The instant more than one explanation is possible, the jury must pick the one pointing to innocence.
You're explanation happens to be mostly wrong. I use the hunt and peck method I learned on a manual typewrite. Worked much better there, because keys were not nearly as senstive and I could correct mistakes before striking the keys hard enough to actuate them to strike a letter.
So I often think I hit a letter, when in fact I first touch an adjacent one. I then don't see it.
You're answer is wrong.
What you think I misread about your silly game is that your answer is the only one, and by not giving it, I flunked your test.
It's you who are administering a bogus test.
The fact is, your conclusion is but one inference that can be drawn from another one that can be directy drawn from the one fact that I identified that you did, and that fact is that you corrected my typos which hid my bad typing, from which any number of inbference can be drawn about why the typing errors occurred in the first place.
I'm done with this subject.
Prien