[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: [email protected]
Date: 3/17/03
Time: 7:24:22 PM
Remote Name: 152.163.188.67
Jasper responds in part:
You can use selected portions of the transcripts to “prove” anything you want. The only way to get the truth is to put everything in context. That’s what make’s Rossi’s testimony significant. It puts Phillips’ testimony in context by establishing a coroner notification routine in violation of the law that the LAPD practiced for years before the murders.
[Rossi's testimony proves nothing about the point I was making that Phillips sought to carry out the obligations of an investigator and was ORDERED not to do so by his superior.
You sought to make it appear that Phillips was not an inestigator. Fuhrman's answer makes clear that he signed in as and was in facvt and INVESTIGATOR in the case. therefore, he had all the responsibilities of an investigator that he in fact sought to discharge but was ORDERED NOT TO.
THE KEY AND CRITICAL POINT THIS FACT MAKES CLEAR IS THAT THE COVER UP IS FROM ABOVE AND NOT BELOW AS YOU SEEK TO MAKE IT OUT.
If Fuhrman was the killer and the man responsible for the frame-up, how does his testimony prove anything? It doesn’t unless there is independent verification that he consistently told the truth or that he consistently lied at all the key paces that a frame-up artist had to lie to protect himself. The evidence is clear that Fuhrman consistently lied in ALL of those key places. Illusionists call it “misdirection.”
[SO DID A LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE. THAT ALSO DOES NOT PROVE THEY COMMITTED THE MURDERS. IT DOES, HOWEVER, PROVE THEY PARTICIPAFTED IN THE COVER UP.]
During the preliminary hearing Fuhrman misdirected the defense my testifying that Phillips was his partner, thereby creating the illusion that Phillips was the senior investigator. Fuhrman’s partner was BRAD ROBERTS. Phillips had the title of Detective III, which would have quailed him to sign in as an investigator (although I haven’t see a copy of the sigh in sheet – have you?). His responsibly was that of a supervisor and facilitator. Fuhrman was his investigator. To facilitate Fuhrman’s investigation, there was no reason that he couldn’t have made the call, but it was Fuhrman’s responsibility.
[Fact: Phillips was the lead detective of the West Los Angeles Detective Division (hence Fuhrman's direct boss. He was, therefore a qualified INVESTIGATOR of any homicve within the division's jurisdiction. You simly cannot get around the fact that he was ORDERED not to make an not9if9ication that was legally frequired at the time he sought to make it. FUHMAN HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS, AND IT WAS THE KEY ELEMENT IN THE COVER UP THAT FOLLOWED WITHOUT WHICH NONE OF FUHRMAN'S PLANS WOULD HAVE AMOUNTED TO A HILL OF SQUAT.
It's not a question of integrity, but reason and rationality.
Rossi's status had nothing to do with the point I was making. As I made clear immediately, it was a smokescreen that detracted from the real point at issue.
Prien