[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jasper
Date: 2/3/03
Time: 2:12:05 AM
Remote Name: 66.72.160.105
Rose,
That is so weird on so many levels that I don’t know where to begin.
We’ve looked at coincidence after coincidence between key players in the O.J. murder investigation and other high-profile cases; Clinton’s impeachment, Vince Foster’s suspicious death and now the Moxley murder. Some of these coincidences are, no doubt, nothing more than that. It is a mathematical absurdity that even half of these events occurred independently. The Mickey Sherman link to the O.J. case is WAY too much.
It wouldn’t be so bad if the links didn’t all include Dominick Dunne and Mark Fuhrman in one way or another. But they do.
Look at it this way…
Two years after the Sutton Report – instigated by Dunne’s articles about the William Kennedy Smith rape trial, Mickey Sherman just happens to be sitting next to O.J.’s girlfriend in Los Vegas when she gets the call telling her about the Bundy murders. At this point it means nothing because he is not a Skakel attorney in the Martha Moxley murder investigation. There is zero connection between accused murderer O.J. Simpson and Michel Skakel who isn’t even a murder suspect until Fuhrman gets involved.
Fuhrman makes a case that prompts the Connecticut authorities to call a grand jury targeting Michael. Somebody talks the Skakel’s into hiring Sherman (who?) and Dunne (the enemy) promptly buddies up to him. Sherman sees no conflict of interest and assures the Skakels that the case against Michael is so weak that there is no way he can be convicted. He does a half-assed job and Michael is convicted – but when you look at the prosecution’s case, Sherman was right. There was no factual case against Michael. NONE. All they had was Fuhrman’s book, his reputation for being a brilliant detective and a corrupt prosecutor with a high-tech method of presenting evidence that could have been used with equal effect on five different suspects.
Now look at the Elan witnesses whose words and reputed words had such an impact on the jury – Joseph Ricci (the owner of the school) and Gregg Coleman. Neither of them even testified at Michael’s trial. They didn’t testify for a good reason. They were dead. –Jasper